“To be engaged learners, students need their teachers to be engaged learners.”

On Tuesday night, a group of classroom teachers and community educators launched an inquiry series to explore the connections between our work.  Joan pulled threads, which are posted on our ning site and below.  I’ll re-post my response below also, and will continue to incorporate reflections coming out of the series in this blog.



November 1, 2011


There were a mix of recollections – from childhood and adulthood, as a student and as an educator. What all of them had in common was a layering and depth of experience, that allowed us or our students to see ourselves in a new way that opened possibilities, changed our expectations and understandings of ourselves and the world. Something important changed because of this experience.

A number of the experiences were over time; a few were one time. They all seemed to live on into the present for us, in who we are and the underlying purposes of work we do and the way we choose to live in the world.

Many of our stories were tied to the land, a sense of place, an understanding of the natural and human history of a place.  For some of us this place was local, around Chicago or in it. The idea that history is not just in the past, but we can go to a place a connect with the history. We can study and come to know the human connection to space experientially (helping to build an Indian village over time using the original tools while learning from elders the way to be in the space; finding a piece of flint that had been used by native dwellers to make arrowheads and learning how to make them now; researching laws about living on the river, standing in Grant Park hearing stories from the ’68 Convention; seeing artifacts in the Chicago History Museum that were connected to you because you had studied the Fort Dearborn Battle as a character who had been there.)  There was an underlying sense of reverence, seeking deep roots and seeking knowledge, seeing the ecological systems, and a link toward present commitments to working around issues of environmental and human capacity, possibility and justice.

Some stories spoke to “opening glass doors” which took some significant risk, work, commitment, time, and always at least one other person, often supported by a program, creating an experience, to open the door – both ways – so we discovered a passion and saw something new in ourselves, new possible paths in the future (going to college, being an artist, “belonging” in the Planetarium as a person who knew a thing or two about space, seeing a way to create experiences for children that would connect them with history, human suffering, and being a part of the ‘arc toward justice.’ )

Sometimes these experiences took place because we were seeking something (deeper roots, meaning in our work, what it feels like to be a minority) or saw something unfair (some people get to live right on the river, some historical figures have artifacts in the museum and some don’t, a person left this place because she saw me, a white person, here). Sometimes they happened to us and opened our eyes and hearts to new connections, and new worlds (the world of art beginning with tissue paper, wire, and encouraging questions from a new adult about what this person created.) Questions, our own and others, were central to many of our stories in opening things up or carrying them forward: a sign of interest in us and our work, as a way to see injustice and begin to work toward more justice, a way to connect or to share a personal passion which became one of ours, and created a group of people who shared and carried forward this passion.

Our words and phrases about engaged learning at the end of our meeting harkened back to the stories: field trips! Collaboration. Teachers as engaged learners. Sense of place. Resonance. relevance. connection. grounding in place and people. sanctity and reverence. expanding the boxes. wholeness. inclusiveness. community connections. multi-voiced.

I hope others of you will add the threads you heard and felt…

and here’s my response:

Why didn’t we do this in school???  I was struck by the theme of knowledge, practices, approaches that are meaningful to me NOT included in classroom learning for many of us.

I was also struck by the frequent references to “outside” — whether that be physically outdoors or something different from the routine, expectations, norms that usually bound us.  Nature, outdoors, were described as spaces of release, risk, resistance to bounds, requirements, conventions.  POSSIBILITY.

What came out of the evening’s process for me was a strong sense of us (learners, teachers) as wild things.  How we sought out forests and open spaces, whether they were empty lots down the street or materials that invited new parts of ourselves to emerge and create.  These inviting wildernesses had their corollaries within us: a key question, a demand that we adjust our way of being to be part of a larger consciousness.  These adjustments were polar opposites, though, to the behavioral and mental norms of school life, which for some of us reduced rather than expanded our sense of being.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s